Monday, December 28, 2015

Before the Awakening

I might make some mention of Episode VII, so be cautious if you haven't seen the movie yet.

I'll come in with another chocolate review next post, but for now while I'm still recovering from Christmastime, here is the latest Star Wars read. Before the Awakening came out on the same day as the movie, and I was only able to buy it that weekend because Wal-Mart is carrying it right now (I can't wait until I can go to Barnes & Noble this week to buy the movie art book--no, I don't want to buy it online). So in this case, thank you, Wal-Mart.

Although it's a short book like the Luke, Leia, and Han Solo adventure books (with the same red and black color scheme), it took me a few days to read it since it was Christmastime. Monday I was baking cookies, Tuesday I was trying to finish off regular tasks, Wednesday I think I was finishing some gift-wrapping, Thursday I was cleaning and prepping a turkey, Friday was Christmas (and the Doctor Who Christmas special, which I watched at midnight), Saturday was a day of rest (also the day in which I finished reading this book), and I can't quite remember what I did yesterday. So. It's a quick read if you have the time to sit there for a few minutes reading.

In a way, it feels like this book had more content than the previously-mentioned three. Maybe it feels that way because the trio are already established characters who were just having separate adventures in those books, while the new trio of this book is still, well, new. Even after seeing The Force Awakens, we still know only so much about them. So anything we glean about who they are (not just their identity, but also their character, since their characters are still being established) is significant.

Poe is the most established character. In the movie, his identity isn't really mysterious and his character is so straightforward as to be quick to establish. And this book explains his backstory. Finn, though not quite as straightforward, is also not too mysterious. The book takes off from what we know about him already and provides a look at the time before the movie scenes, showing that his decision wasn't quite spur-of-the-moment. Rey being the most mysterious character also has the least backstory in here: we just see her scavenging on Jakku and learn more about her state of mind than her identity or her history. It makes you realize more where she is emotionally and in terms of hope and resolve than anything else.

Each story was told on its own: the first section is for Finn, the second for Rey, and the third for Poe. Rey's was by far my favorite section (I love characters walking around the desert, I really do--battles are less interesting to me), and Finn's was probably my least favorite (part of the reason might be that it was a little dragging to keep reading him as FN-2187, though of course it's necessary for the story). For being such a short book with such a quick look at these characters, this story is a nice after-the-movie read to feed your craving for more without really taking away from the ultimate mysteries.

Sunday, December 20, 2015

The Force Awakens

This post contains spoilers. Do not continue reading if you have not seen the movie yet.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Twilight Company & the Wars in the Stars

I knew this was probably a book I could skip but I wanted to read all the Star Wars books that came out this year. Even still, when I picked it up to buy at the bookstore, I hesitated over seeing the cover in person: it just looks like a book I wouldn't be interested in. But I got it, anyway.

I've never been a video game person, so it's a little strange to be reading a book based on a video game. While I was seeing all the displays in stores about Battlefront: Twilight Company the game, I was at home reading Battlefront: Twilight Company the novel. I guess that was my way of taking part in the game everyone else was enjoying?

Anyway, the fact that the book is based on a video game isn't exactly what made it not my type of book. It's the battle and military focus that wasn't quite in line with my interests: I like the drama, the literary qualities, and the character arcs in Star Wars more than the actual wars. And this book is all about one battle after the next. First they go to this planet and fight, then this planet, then that planet. Maybe a battle in space in between. Morale in the company is low and then it goes back up and then it's low again and then it goes back up. All kind of monotonous to someone who isn't interested in military stories.

When I started reading this book, I had three weeks until Episode VII was going to come out. So I figured I would read the book in a week and then have a couple of weeks to rest from my Star Wars book marathon of the last several months. It didn't quite happen that way. I spent the first two weeks just getting through the first fourth of the novel. Then I spent about three days on the middle half. And then I read the last fourth yesterday in a desperate attempt to finish before the movie's opening day (even though I don't think I'll be watching it until Saturday).

So suffice it to say, as I'd expected, I had trouble getting into this book. But you know, in those last couple of days I think it did start to draw me in, in its own way. The characters were starting to feel like people: I felt like I was watching them in a TV show, like they were tangibly there, moving from one episode to the next. And it is always kind of nice to get a new perspective on the Star Wars events that we're all used to. The main force of the Rebellion plays out certain battles, but Twilight Company does a lot of dirty work and a lot of widespread work on the many, many planets under the Empire's hold. (Side note: for this being a military book, it wasn't graphic about the wounds and fighting--other Star Wars books I've read this year have been more graphic, which was kind of surprising.)

And now I'm officially read for Episode VII. Which, in turn, means that starting tonight, I think I'll hide from the Internet for the next couple of days until after I've seen the movie. You never know where spoilers will appear.

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Mouse's Chocolates: Assortment

I love it when people bring me back chocolate from their travels. I've only been to Colorado once, when my plane landed there for a connection and I had to run to the gate because the first plane had left late due to weather conditions--I made it, even though it was past the time that the doors were supposed to close. While I've been to few enough states that I consider this brief moment to have been time in Colorado, I realize that I haven't really been to Colorado.

But these chocolates are from Colorado, deep in mountains in the "Switzerland of America," also known as Ouray. The company? Mouse's Chocolates & Coffee. Cute name. Cute logo. Basic style to the boxes and the chocolates. They look like simple confections, like what you might find at any little chocolate shop in any city. I took pictures and arranged them and didn't think about much. But then I began to taste them and I realized there was something more to these simple chocolates.

I can't remember now which one I had first (I didn't think, in this case, I would need to take notes like usual). So let's start with Peanut Butter (dark chocolate with milk chocolate stripes). A lot of the times, I'll prefer a Reese's cup to peanut butter chocolates: Americans are so used to that salty, crumbly peanut butter filling that the more creamy, buttery ones just don't seem quite right. That's the type of filling I was expecting here, but it isn't what I found. The texture is actually quite similar to real peanut butter, softer than what's in a Reese's cup but not too buttery; and there is just the right light hint of salt to distinguish this chocolate from others.

Now for Mint (milk chocolate with green stripes). Mint doesn't always work well with milk chocolate: the milk chocolate isn't always strong enough to hold the mint in. And mint tastes bad if it isn't fresh-tasting. This chocolate, though, is nice. The mint is strong and sweet, and the milk chocolate is cool and neutral. It has a nice melty flavor and texture. This is probably the most basic of the four chocolates I tried, but it's still alright.

The other two are seasonal flavors, starting with Gingerbread (milk chocolate with three white dots that mimic the buttons on a gingerbread man). Good work with flavor here. The ginger comes in nice and fresh, accompanied by the other usual spices and the warmth of the chocolate. As I learned with Theo's Gingerbread Spice bar a couple of years ago, the gingerbread flavors work especially well with milk chocolate. Put them in the right balance, as they are in this chocolate, and you have a winning holiday confection.

But if the flavor work was good in the Gingerbread chocolate, it's excellent with the Egg Nog one (dark chocolate with white stripes). I seem to have tried at least one egg nog chocolate before, but when it was is escaping my memory, so maybe this one is the first. Either way, I have nothing to use for comparison besides egg nog itself. And even to egg nog itself this chocolate stands tall. The filling is white and a little stiffer than the fillings on these other chocolates. And it hits all the points of egg nog right on the dot: the thick texture, the almost eggy flavor of cream, the nutmeg in the center with other spices on the edges. Very well done and amazing, definitely the best of the four.

So I was kind of wrong. I was expecting basic confections like the kind you'd find anywhere. But these are nicely done confections. The simple flavors are balanced well enough to be a step above the usual, and the seasonal flavors have a lot of thought put into them to have exactly the taste that you'd expect from gingerbread and egg nog. If at some point I actually set foot on Colorado's soil and made my way all the way to Ouray, I would definitely make a stop at Mouse's for some more chocolates.

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Writing Adventures: Part 2

Click here to read Part 1. 

After I graduated college, it was exciting to have more time to focus on this writing project of mine--but it also took some getting used to. Suddenly I was able to often spend hours at a time on a project that I had once added to with one tiny piece every couple months at a time. I needed focus now and I needed organization and I needed constant, renewable drive. Music helped some; I'll do a separate post with the book's playlist later, but for now I'll just say that Flyleaf's Memento Mori is so very in sync with this book.

By this point, my book was divided into twenty sections that were each in turn divided into three sections (one per each of the three narrators). Some of the sections, though, had as little as one sentence, while others were fully developed but were only a page or so long. So I developed a method of adding to it all. I went from beginning to end, sub-section to sub-section, and edited the parts I had already written while also adding a pre-determined length to each section.

I did this a few times, slowly adding length so that I could end up with a decent word count. Each time I would finish, I would realize I wasn't there yet and needed more: my book is based less on plot than on imagery, so I had to fill in and brush on details (and even a sprinkling of plot) to make it full. I kept going until I had reached a mild 71,000 words and enough coherency and cohesiveness and all that was left was another edit for grammar/typos and any final adjustments.

But let's back up a step to the strangest part. At about the period where I was able to spend more time on writing, I encountered a certain difficulty with the third narrator (who is the only present day narrator). She used to be a twenty-something. But I was beginning to feel like she was glaring at me, accusing me of not getting her story right; I was afraid to work on her sections because I didn't know what was wrong. And then it hit me. She wasn't in her twenties at all: she's middle-aged. And then some other pieces quickly adjusted to fit in with the different age and suddenly everything was smooth again, so swiftly. This, in turn, meant that I emphasized the youngness of the second narrator (whom I picture to be around sixteen or so) more than I had before (in a positive way, though). And the fact that the three narrators aren't the same age somehow became more cohesive than if they were all, say, in their twenties.

I spent a lot of time while I was working on this book hating it: I think that's just my style. In college, as soon as I would finish writing a paper, I would hate it but it would be too late. So I would turn it in and try and not think about it anymore; but when I got it back, I ended up with an A and realized my hate was unfounded. The hate, hopefully, just means that I can keep a critical eye and change what needs to be changed and make better what is okay but could be wonderful. So ultimately I came to create a novel that I thought made sense as a piece of writing, as something that could be talked about and written about.

Next up: trying to convince outside sources that this novel was worth publishing.

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Christmas Movies

I don't watch all of these every year, but when I think of Christmas movies, these are usually the ones I mean. Once I put them all in a list, I realize that there aren't really that many--and when I hear other people talk about Christmas movies, I realize that they include a lot of others that I've never really seen much of. But here's the type of movie that usually surrounds my December.

1) Mickey's Christmas Carol - Growing up, we didn't have too many movies, but this was one of them. I suppose it was my first introduction to A Christmas Carol. It was slightly creepy to me because it does have a bit of a dark, shadowy tone to it (even to the Christmas carols, I thought), but I also liked it. And who better to share the idea of the Christmas spirit than Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and the rest? This is probably my favorite version, though Patrick Stewart's is good, too; I never watched the Muppet version until a couple years ago, so I don't have that connection with it that other people have (though I did like it).

2) How the Grinch Stole Christmas - I'm referring to the Jim Carrey version. We did have the animated one (not the more popular version that has the song in it--the other one), but kind of stopped watching it after the live action movie came out. It's the right kind of movie for winter: it's funny and lighthearted but also makes you think that it had a nice message in the end.

3) The Nativity Story - I still get a kick out of the fact that Catherine Hardwicke directed both this movie and Twilight, though there is in fact a lot of common ground. And that's I think what I liked about this movie: it approached Mary as a person more than most movies of this story tend to do. Keeping it simple and maintaining focus on the right things helped, too. Overall I find it nicely done.

4) Home Alone (1 & 2) - Given what I said before about not owning a lot of movies, we would sometimes watch this one at other times of the year than Christmas: it almost felt only like half a Christmas movie, even though it's filled with Christmas scenery. I would only occasionally catch a little of the second movie if it was playing on TV; the last couple of years, though, I've tried to watch both of them because they're both good. The second one is mainly just a repeat of the first one, but in this case that's perfectly okay.

5) The Santa Claus - You guessed it; this was another of the few movies we owned (I mean, we owned more than a few, just not a huge amount). It's been good to return to this one over the years: jokes that I didn't understand when I was seven I suddenly understand years later. Another movie that combines goofy comedy with some fantasy and something of a nice message. And it's easier to watch over and over than The Grinch, I think: something about the way the plot just rolls out has that cult classic feel.

6) Fitzwilly - This isn't really a Christmas movie, but I realized that it almost can be since it takes place during Christmastime. It's from the sixties, starring Dick Van Dyke and Barbara Feldon and a lot of other great cast members from the era. I first saw it a few years ago and somehow it wormed its way into being one of my favorite movies. It also has a little of a cult classic feel to it. It's kind of quotable, if only I had anyone to quote it to who's also seen the movie ("The one with the pink eyelids." I love that line.) It's about servants who work for a previously wealthy woman who doesn't know that she's now in debt; they have an elaborate business of stealing to maintain her lavish lifestyle and are doing quite well at it until she decides to hire her own secretary (Barbara Feldon), whom the butler (Dick Van Dyke) tried to scare away but ends up falling in love with instead. It's just a fun movie that gets better once you've seen it a couple times.

7) Doctor Who Christmas Episodes - These aren't movies; they're TV episodes--but given that most of the Christmas episodes are at least an hour, you can watch them like short movies. I tried that out last year and I'm starting it again this year. I just watched "Voyage of the Damned" today, which is pretty good. "A Christmas Carol" is also actually quite touching, with a good cast.

I have this feeling like I've forgotten something but I can't think of what. Anyway, I suppose seven is a good enough number to leave on. Happy movie-watching.

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Holly Nog: Chocolate Mint Nog

I stopped drinking milk before it was popular to do so, back when regular grocery stores didn't carry soy or anything. My family had to go to Trader Joe's (which was about two hours away) and buy a case of soy to last us until our next trip over. Then at some point we all switched to almond (soy's rather chalky after you stop drinking it, though almond does have a nutty flavor that occasionally gets in the way--but there is more organic almond for sale than organic soy). So Christmastime is pretty much the only time when I still buy milk, in the form of egg nog, that is.

It took time to even realize whether or not I liked egg nog. I just had to buy one small carton each year for a while, just for the tradition of it. It has such a strange, thick texture that it's entertaining somehow to drink it. But now I tend to still buy the one carton of milk egg nog and then supplement it throughout the season with different brands of soy or almond egg nog to see which one tastes most like the regular milk kind. It's kind of a game now.

And then I saw this bottle at World Market. It's wine nog. I've only had one kind of alcoholic egg nog (the kind they sell at Costco) and I thought it was horrible (too much like alcohol rather than a spiked drink). So why I should get excited at this bottle, I don't know. . . . Oh, yes, because it is also chocolate nog. With mint. And made with cream. Shouldn't that be too much flavor to maintain the regular egg nog taste? Well, it still sounded really good to me, maybe because the chocolate-milky liquid in the bottle looked like a chocolate wine from World Market that I did enjoy a few years ago.

In taste, first this drink is sweet, then the alcohol comes in and that milky/creamy chocolate flavor, and then the milk. I don't know that it tastes specifically like wine; it just has that mild alcoholic taste to show that there is something besides cream and mint.

As far as the chocolate element goes, it is more of a milk chocolate than a dark or semisweet. While in a chocolate candy you would want dark chocolate to go with the mint instead of milk chocolate, here it works as milk chocolate because the mint flavor comes in more during the last stage and as an aftertaste. The two don't overlap at precisely the same moment. It's more as if you're eating a milk chocolate cream followed by a peppermint.

While this nog is sweet, it isn't sweet like dessert wine; rather, it is sweet like an actual dessert. The sweetness pairs with the cream and the chocolate just as it would in a dessert. So the chocolate isn't overly pronounced and maybe not even the dominant flavor--but I like the proportions as they are because this keeps the drink light and casual.

Once again we come to the question: is it like egg nog? Kind of. It has some of that thicker, creamier consistency that definitely puts you in mind of egg nog. But the flavor reminds me less of traditional egg nog because I'm not paying as much attention to the spices as to the chocolate and mint--which is the idea, after all. But there is enough of that spiced flavor to taste like the holidays.

Overall, I quite like it. I find that I can't drink much of it, whether it's because it's alcohol or because it's sweet (or a combination) I'm not sure. But it would be nice for a party, maybe because it's alcohol without really feeling like alcohol; and if your guests are like me, you can just split one bottle into small portions and you'll all be happy. It would be great with dessert, whether a flourless chocolate cake or gingerbread men or something lighter like sponge cake or vanilla ice cream. Or just let it be dessert in itself.

Monday, December 7, 2015

What Do You Celebrate? Christmas Edition

'Tis the time when I bring to you some sort of expression not of what you celebrate or what the person sitting over there celebrates but of what I celebrate. 'Tis the time for celebrating Christmas.

Christmas, as the biggest holiday of the year, may also be the most multi-faceted. It means so many things at once and also so many different things to different people. And also what we do celebrate may differ from what we may say that we're celebrating.

I think that one of my favorite things (as in physical things) about Christmas is the Christmas tree. I love setting it up and looking at all the glowing lights and each individual ornament and building up the pretty presents underneath. I love spotting trees at the mall or in people's windows. Christmas trees are like happiness in the darkened, cold winter days. They're like beacons: they bring people together, first to set them up and then later on to serve as the mailbox for gifts to one another. It's very sweet. And, yes, I do have a preference to a star on top, though there are some very pretty angels, too.

Visually, Christmas gives you something to look at and think about when it's cold and the days get dark so early and you just need a little something sparkly to cheer you up.

Thematically, I realize that I have almost been treating Christmas like Part 2 of Thanksgiving. I'm not sure if that's a good or bad thing. Christmas, in true A Christmas Carol style, is about remembering the good things that you have been giving and returning that kindness to your family, your friends, and anybody that you pass by in your life. That's where the presents come in and the gifting of cookies (I have a tradition of gingerbread cookie giving) and such. Which is good. And it's an easy way to make Christmas universal for people of different backgrounds (or to make Christmas a public holiday, that is). But Christmas is something more than that, isn't it?

In addition to the trees, I also like the nativity sets. One of mine is a teeny, tiny, vintage one of some sort of tan plastic with many, many little pieces. I like decorating with nativity sets because they remind me of what, past the cookies and the presents and the glittering lights and the generic wishes of goodwill, I should really be celebrating. Easter is about the death and resurrection, but Christmas is simply a celebration of the birth of Jesus. Simply a grand, joyous celebration of God's gift to Mankind. It's a memory and it's a thank you and it's worship. Suddenly Christmas is not so complicated anymore; suddenly it is the simplest of holidays. I think listening to Rend Collective's Christmas album last year helped me realize that celebration should be the biggest part of Christmas: and it's really the most amazing thing to celebrate. We have every reason to be joyous around Christmastime.

Friday, December 4, 2015

The Question that Must Be Asked

On Wednesday, Andrea Bocelli was in Phoenix and I had the pleasure of attending his concert. It was very good: the backdrop and projections were beautiful and all of the accompanying musicians and singers were also wonderful. Heather Headley sang a rendition of "Over the Rainbow" that was so unique that it made me start about the song and the story all over again.

You see, I had recently commented that it's almost odd that "Over the Rainbow" has become such a popular song, an anthem for The Wizard of Oz: the song speaks about longing for something else, while the theme of the story is about realizing that what you already have is what you want and need. And there isn't really a song at the end of the movie to illustrate that theme.

But if it were all so simple as realizing the theme of the movie before it is even stated or actualized, then we wouldn't need a movie to illustrate that theme, would we? And Dorothy wouldn't have needed to go on a whole adventure to realize that message, either.

So the reason that "Over the Rainbow" is the anthem is because, no matter how much we are told to be thankful for what we have, we must still ask the question for ourselves. We must ask why we cannot soar far away, far beyond our scope of sight. We must dream . . . because in dreaming we realize our full potential.

If you never ask why you cannot be, then you will never be. If you never ask why you cannot achieve, then you will never achieve. If you never ask why you cannot soar, then you will never soar.

The key matter is simply that in order to be, to achieve, and to soar, we do not need the fantasy of wings like birds. We don't need to transfigure ourselves or to fly away to another world. Everything that we need is right here at our fingertips. That does not, of course, mean that simply by wanting something you will have it. It just means that contentment is in your hands, joy is in your reach, and accomplishment is in your power. And in order to realize that, you must first ask the question of why. Why can't I fly over the rainbow? . . . Oh, yes, that's right: I'm already there.

The Hillywood Show's Hocus Pocus Parody

Well, well, well, what do we have here? It's the newest parody by The Hillywood Show. Though their last one was very good, it's been several months now since it was released, enough time to make me want something more. Hilly and Hannah have begun asking for regular fan funding through Patreon, and I think they might have been hoping to have enough funding to start this project sooner. Then YouTube was giving problems with the upload and it didn't come out until Wednesday, though it was supposed to debut last weekend. And I didn't have the chance to watch it until last night (which felt really strange because I can usually watch their videos as soon as they're out).

But if there there delays or complications getting this video made, it's all in the past now: the final product turned out great. The subject is the early '90's movie Hocus Pocus, which I had to watch to prepare for the parody since I'd never seen it before. And the song is a medley from The Nightmare Before Christmas, making this the second time Hillywood has used a song from there (Gagaween a few years ago was the first time). The songs work flawlessly and have a lighthearted, fun tone that helps to portray the comedy side of the movie. The chorus may be about kidnapping children, but it's never sinister or dark--just fun and silly. And the fact that the songs are from a Halloween/Christmas movie is kind of nice now that it's closer to Christmas than to Halloween.

I didn't realize until I watched the Behind the Scenes that this parody involved their first complete 360 degree set. And it really is detailed. The costumes and makeup are also so well done, some of their best work. Overall, very polished and yet also filmed and edited together in such a way as to not detract from the spontaneity of the song and storyline. Maybe less people will happen on this parody because less people are YouTubing Hocus Pocus than than are big movies, but it has good rewatchability, which leads to more views (and happy viewers).

Sunday, November 29, 2015

November Favorites

1) Downton Abbey Holiday Cheer Tea - Time to add to my Downton Abbey tea collection with their holiday teas. I believe this one is new this year, and I chose it over the others (which I hope to get later) because it has vanilla (along with cinnamon). I didn't realize until I brought it home, however, that it's rooibos instead of black tea. I would have preferred black tea. But the cinnamon and vanilla are still wonderful, and it's a good spiced tea for winter.

2) Suede Gloves - Some people went Black Friday shopping to chain stores; I went to antique stores on Saturday (mostly just to walk around, not looking to buy something) and happened on these gloves for six dollars. They're an almost perfect fit (my green leather ones I got at a different antique store for $14 are a perfect fit, though I'm glad I have another color option now), too.

3) Downton Abbey Lady Cora's Evening Tea - This one isn't a holiday blend, but it's good for the holidays because I tend to drink more tea when it's cold, making herbal tea a good addition to the mix. Along with the chamomile and lemon balm, there are quite a few other flowers in there, too, to keep the flavor interesting.

4) Wise Man Ornament - I like camels for some reason and they're my favorite part of a Nativity set. I already had one of these ornaments; this year I got the other two to go along with it and complete the trio. Here is one.

5) Enchanted Forest Coloring Book - Actually I've had this one for a while; I just keep forgetting to include it. While this type of coloring book has been so popular lately, I think that Johanna Basford's are the best. All the detail, yet with pictures instead of just having patterns. And the whimsy and prettiness are just what I want if I'm starting back on coloring books again. I got the 50 color Crayola colored pencils set to go along with it.

6) Wise Man Ornament - Here is the other one.

7) King Leo Peppermint Sticks - I thought these looked like they would be good, and I was right. They're sort of like those chalky after-dinner mints, which I love (is that strange of me?). I found them at Hobby Lobby, by the way.

8) Wise Man Ornament - And here is the one I had from before.

9) Zhena's Holiday Tea Set - Sometimes sets have good flavors and not as good flavors; this one just has good flavors. Sugar Cookie was a surprising stand-out and maybe my favorite, packed with spices like ginger and black pepper and nutmeg. Peppermint Mocha tastes much like one of the holiday teas Trader Joe's sells, with that creamy minty flavor. Gingerbread Chai has the usual flavors, just a little smoother. English Toffee is the most basic of the four and the one where you can taste the rooibos the most (they're all rooibos except for Sugar Cookie--maybe that's why that one is my favorite).

10) Triceratops Ornament - I keep a little tree with mainly just animals (that's why the camels fit in), some of which are dinosaurs. The new one this year is this blue triceratops.

Friday, November 27, 2015

Sneaky Chef: Chocolate No-Nut Butter

This product was provided free to me; my comments and opinions, however, are my own.

Yesterday was a lovely Thanksgiving. We tried cooking the turkey on the grill for the first time, and I was surprised at how quickly and well it worked out; that was probably the best turkey I've had. And the Christmas decorations are now up, all glowing and shiny. Yes, this is the season for staying at home, watching favorite movies, and eating lots of bread and sweets. Or maybe sweets on top of bread?

That's where this chocolate spread comes in. It's a Chocolate No-Nut Butter from Sneaky Chef. If, like me, you had never heard of Sneaky Chef before, here is their style: they make healthier versions of common treats, adding less sugar and sneaking in vegetables. (Here's where I hope it isn't like those bean chips and cereal I tried, which sounded like a good idea but just tasted like burnt beans.) So we know that this spread has no nuts. These days it's mostly about Nutella (while I love chocolate and hazelnuts together, there are much better, less plasticy chocolate hazelnut spreads out there) and maybe some oily chocolate spreads. The substitution for nuts in this spread is yellow peas. Interesting. I never eat yellow peas (I don't think I ever even see yellow peas), but the label tells me that they taste "naturally sweet and nutty," which makes them perfect for a chocolate spread. The spread is also non-GMO, has less than 1/2 the sugar of the leading chocolate spread, is soy/gluten/dairy free, and has no high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oils, or artificial colors/flavors.

Whew. Okay, now that we have that out of the way, let's get to the tasting. Because if it doesn't taste good, then none of the rest of that matters.

I admit that I was surprised at how nice this spread smelled when I opened up the jar: it smells more like a fudge spread than just a chocolate spread. And it looks beautiful, going on nice and smooth. I tried it first on brioche toasts from Trader Joe's, which are halfway between bread and crackers and are therefore the perfect accompaniment for snacking on chocolate spread.

For how smooth the spread feels at first, it has the slightest dusty graininess in texture once you taste it. This, however, is not exactly a terrible thing, especially given that it doesn't have the plasticy texture of so many chocolate spreads (which is probably the number one thing I dislike in a chocolate spread). So just not being plasticy is a big deal to me.

Now, when you have this spread on top of bread or whatever else, you'll basically just taste chocolate. But if you're eating it off the spoon, you will get a slightly earthy kind of flavor (not bitter earthy, something much lighter than that). Again, this flavor isn't bad; it's just probably a little different from what most people are expecting from a chocolate spread. The Sneaky Chef didn't quite cover up the fact that there's something unusual inside--but she did make the unusual element taste generally nice and make sense in the mix.

The sweetness level is exactly balanced, as is the taste of the chocolate, which is neither milk chocolate nor dark chocolate, just chocolate spread. And do you know what? The more I eat it, the more this spread is starting to taste like peanuts. I don't know how that happens. Now I'm getting tempted to get some regular bread instead of the brioche toasts, just so I can keep eating more. The press release also suggests adding the spread to cupcakes, or heating to make fondue. Cupcake icing sounds good. Maybe even add it to ice cream?

For me, the strange thing is the fact that this spread was not made for me. I don't have allergies and I'm fine with eating the vegetables and the desserts separately instead of mixing them. So this isn't something I would really have tried on my own, and I wonder if even now I would buy it on my own. And I'm not quite sure. The non-GMO thing is what makes me lean toward saying yes, as is the flavor. But then again I guess I don't buy chocolate spread too often anymore, so maybe that's why I'm not sure. The fact is, I think for people who do have allergies or who are trying to sneak vegetables to children (or themselves), this product will be a good fit. It achieves what it set out to do. And it tastes good. (They also make a non-chocolate version, by the way.)

Sunday, November 22, 2015

The Jedi Return

I know, I'm late posting and I'm stacking Star Wars posts again, but I have been busy with things, so I'll just set this post down because it's ready to go, even though I have others planned. 

Well, well, I am so glad. In the young reader retellings of the original trilogy, I enjoyed the first book and quite well disliked the second--but am happy to report that the third one (full title: Return of the Jedi: Beware the Power of the Dark Side!) brought the level back up. True, it's a completely different reading experience from the original Return of the Jedi novelization, but it's still good.

Tom Angleberger may have taken even more of a neutral stance than Alexandra Bracken did with her narrative: he's just telling a story, sticking to simple terms and descriptions so as not to daunt his age group and sparing readers some of the details of the fights but not dumbing anything down or talking down to his readers at all. The narrative voice of this book is simple in a way that just allows you to see the characters and what's going on.

Of the three, this book also was the one to most tie in the OT with what we now know from the PT and maybe also other content. I'm referring to the slight discrepancies that exist between the two trilogies. Leia says she has slight memories of her real mother and yet in Episode III, Padme dies as soon as her children are born. In the novelization, we learn that Owen Lars was Obi-Wan's brother and so not actually Luke's uncle. R2 jumps off of Jabba's barge to fall in the sand and yet we see him flying in the PT. Things like that that don't really make sense. They're all tied in and either given an explanation or explained differently (of course Owen wasn't Obi-Wan's brother, so after the PT established that fact, I don't think anyone had the need to refer back to that discrepancy). However it works out, this is a retelling of the story we all know--but with all the details worked out and also with some connection to the characters we know from the PT (Anakin thinks back to Padme, for instance). I would recommend reading this book just for the whole connecting factors alone.

I don't exactly know why, but I love the beginning of Return of the Jedi. Maybe it's because it took me years to realize that there was an elaborate, layered plan to rescue Han. Maybe it's because this is the time that we see Luke as a Jedi for the first time (or, frankly, the first time we see any Jedi in action--because Obi-Wan's lightsaber fight with Vader in Episode IV was, well, brief and simple and more like a sword fight than anything else). Maybe it's just because I love seeing Tatooine on screen. Either way, reading the opening chapters of this book reminded me of these scenes that I love. And some of those pictures were just fantastic.

So let me take a moment to appreciate the pictures in all three of these books (though I kind of think this one had the most--am I wrong?). They're a mix of artwork from Ralph McQuarrie and Joe Johnston--I had already seen some of Ralph McQuarrie's work, but I love having it in hard copy like this. Now that's the way to illustrate a children's book: give them just as good material as you would give any other age group. They'll appreciate it just as much.

While perhaps this book doesn't give as lofty themes as the regular novelization does (all of that about nature overcoming the evil of the cold, industrialized Empire and such), it does provide explanation for all of the little things in the film that children might not perhaps realize on their own. Like I said, it took me years to realize everything about the plan in Jabba's palace--but this book explains that it's all a layered plan. Things like that. So it really would be a helpful companion piece for children who enjoyed the movie; maybe they just want to relive their favorite scenes, but they'll also gain a little more understanding of what's going on.

And I think that's it. I can't believe I've managed to get through this huge stack of Star Wars books; now I only have one left and there are still four weeks before the new movie comes out.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

So You Want to Play Being a Jedi?

I don't know how this happened. In the young readers' retelling of the Star Wars original trilogy, I really enjoyed the first installment for A New Hope. But I don't understand the approach to The Empire Strikes Back at all. The full title is The Empire Strikes Back: So You Want to Be a Jedi? and perhaps that is where the complications begin.

I know this series is for children. But trying to use modern lingo isn't the only way to write for children. I think the reason (or part of the reason) that many children like Star Wars is that it's full of serious moments, moments that aren't dumbed down. And one of the reasons people of any age like Star Wars is because it immerses you so fully into another world.

It's strange because Adam Gidwitz stresses in his author's note that his background is in writing fairy tales, saying that Star Wars is essentially a fairy tale, as well. I agree that it's fantasy, so why do I disagree so much with the approach to this book? Let me try and break it down.

The entire book is told in present tense, which is fairly common these days. It's fine; it works. About half of it is in third person but all of Luke's sections are in the less commonly used second person. The reasoning behind it is that Luke is the character the audience is supposed to be able to see themselves as. Okay, I get that. But those sections of the book aren't just told in second person: they're written as if it is literally you in the story. Which is odd for many reasons. One reason is when the narrator is trying to spare you the mushy parts and tells you that saying that Leia kissed you is necessary, though, so that you can wipe off the kiss or whatever: that's just weird (and what's with all the talk about the mushy parts of the story? If you talk less about how it's necessary to include Han and Leia having a lovers' quarrel, then you can just state it and get it over with if you think your audience really doesn't want to hear it). Another reason for the oddness of the second person perspective is that it gives you no one to strive to be like. Do you see what I mean? Instead of this perspective making me feel closer to the story, all it did was put up a wall. I don't want to be me in the story: I want to see myself in the characters. There's a big difference, even if there are "shell characters" that are intended to be filled in by the audience. So while second person might have been okay, I don't like the way it was used at all.

Then there is something about the narration that almost reminds me of C.S. Lewis in The Chronicles of Narnia, which confuses me because I like Narnia but I didn't like this narrative style. The narrator is constantly making comparisons to things in our world that pull you our of the story: saying R2 looks like a trash can (which is rather rude, isn't it?) and such. And he also refers a lot to the reader, reacting to what he imagines the reader's response is and that sort of thing. I don't always (maybe sometimes) mind when Lewis does this in Narnia because it just adds to the vintage feel and he kind of does sound like an old uncle telling you this story. But in this book, the style just bothered me. It made me feel like the author was talking down to me. I said that The Princess, the Scoundrel, and the Farm Boy seemed like it was for ages 10-12; this one feels more like age eight. I complain all the more because I think Star Wars is great at challenging children's capacity for understanding, so you kind of want to keep the style as elevated and adult as you can. I think.

And the third thing is the worst of all. At the end of most chapters, there is a short Jedi lesson, usually one to three pages. It usually involves telling you to stop what you're doing and meditate, often while having something throw soft objects at you. I'm not even kidding. Tell me how that is helpful or even entertaining. Okay, so the book is obviously trying to place the most emphasis on the Jedi training aspect of this story. Okay. That is important. But applicability, applicability is the problem. Star Wars can be applicable to a person's real life in the themes that it presents, not in lessons about meditating. If you want children to learn something from a story, make the themes about patience, kindness, understanding, and resisting negative impulses very clear. Don't try and bottle them into weird activities--that involve the throwing objects (I'm picturing a sock or pillow knocking over a lamp or a naughty friend/relative throwing a not as soft object--did no one find these suggestions a liability?). And anyway, this isn't supposed to be an activity book. You have children sitting with a book in their hands and you really want them to put that book down to throw things at each other instead? Really? Let's not mention what teachers will do if any children ask them if they can perform these activities during class reading time. And anyway, even if you do ignore the activities in the lessons (which I imagine most people will. Even if some children want to do them at first, there are so many and they're all basically the same that I can't see everyone doing all of them), then you still have all that wasted space that could have been spent on the story instead.

The book wasn't all bad. But the good passages were far outweighed by the mediocre ones. I always felt like there was a wall between me and the story and so I could never really get into it. (The problem is not that it is written for children: some of my favorite books are children's books, some of which I read for the first time as an adult.) This book was very disappointing.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Writing Adventures: Part 1

I have a confession for you all: I'm a writer and not just of blog posts. It has come to my attention that I am crazy (or perhaps overly cautious is the word) for not making some of those blog posts about writing; or maybe the timing just wasn't quite right yet. But it is now. I'd like this new series to come at intervals, updating you on what I've been doing. But first I have to update you on what I have been doing up until now.

Way back during my senior year of high school I started to get this image (of a tree, that is) that I wanted to put down in writing and so I thought I would use it for a scholarship that involved writing a piece of short fiction. So I wrote out this little tableau and I edited it and I tried to get a whole theme and story into it. But as I worked, I realized that I was constraining the image too much by trying to stay within the (fairly short) word count required by the scholarship. So I decided to throw away the idea of using it for the scholarship and let it just grow as much as it wanted.

I worked a little bit on it during the rest of senior year. And then I graduated and went off to college and became a bit more busy. So I was never putting full time work into this piece of writing, but I would return to it now and then and add a scene or another image. I tried to put the date on most of what I wrote because I thought it might be interesting, later on, to see exactly when I wrote particular sections. I would handwrite everything, often on the blank backs of old papers that I didn't need anymore.

I started writing a second narrator and then decided that the two narrators could be put together. Then I added a third narrator. And it all kept growing, tiny piece by tiny piece.

Eventually I typed up all of what I had so far, printed it all (on four pages per sheet so as not to waste paper), and then cut out each individual section and started arranging everything in chronological order on the floor.

You see, I had heard writing advice; I'd heard that you don't need to write first drafts in chronological order. But I always thought that I was a chronological writer. That's how I used to write essays: I would picture the whole thing in my head before I wrote down even one word. But I found that I was writing this project differently, image by image. And the order that I got the images in wasn't necessarily chronological order, especially since I had settled on three narrators simultaneously telling three separate stories. So I ended up with lots of little pieces that needed order, and physically arranging them on the floor, though not a technique I'd expected from myself, turned out to be the best course to take.

Arranging them in order helped me see what pieces were missing, and I continued slowly adding to the project. And then I graduated college with a B.A. in English literature from ASU; I also attended their Barrett Honors College, where I did my senior thesis on three of Charlotte Bronte's novels. And so after graduation, I suddenly had the opportunity to spend much more time on this writing project of mine. That was back in 2013.

To be continued.

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Vanini: Dark Chocolate with Rosemary

Sorry that the alignment on this post is off: I keep setting it to align to the left but most of it just keeps switching to the center. I'm trying to figure out what the problem is.

Hmm, this chocolate is pleasant. A bit minty. Not overly pronounced, though. It's nice. But wait, what am I crunching on? 

It turns out that I was crunching on pieces of sugared rosemary. I think that's a new ingredient in chocolate for me.

Vanini has showed up in the last couple of months at World Market. Given that it's a brand I had never tried before, naturally I had to choose something from their line. It's an Italian, bean to bar chocolate company; the back of the card box also has a Sustainable Trade logo and info about long term partnership with cocoa farmers. That all sounds good--and this 100 gram bar was only $4, which is in the lower price range. 

The chocolate is made with Bagua cocoa, which the label tells me dates back many years to the Mayo Chincipe people (the date they give is 3000 AD, which I suppose must be a typo for BC since I don't suppose they got this cocoa from a thousand years in the future--unless it was just supposed to say 3000 years ago). Hence the "Bagua Lost World Cocoa" line on the front of the box. 

The attractive card box gives way to a foil-wrapped and sealed chocolate bar composed of ten squares. This is the part where I sigh: though sealing the bars in foil keeps them fresh, I do prefer to unwrap the foil instead of having to tear it open. Maybe I'm just strange. 

Rosemary, at first, may sound more like something to put on a turkey than in a bar of chocolate. But rosemary can in fact taste very similar to mint, as long as it's properly proportioned and placed. The chocolate here is 62% cocoa, which is fairly low but not in the bland 50% range. And it's just the right cocoa content for pairing with the rosemary: the chocolate doesn't taste dark but there is just a hint at sweetness in it that helps mellow out the rosemary while also not becoming so sweet that the chocolate is cloying. 

And, yes, the rosemary is sugared, which as you can tell I didn't realize until after I started tasting the chocolate. Since it's in tiny pieces, the effect is almost like crisped rice that has been broken into smaller sizes; it has that same type of crunch. The sugar must also make the rosemary sweeter so that it tastes less like an herb and flows smoothly in with the taste of the chocolate. Never while eating this chocolate do I feel like it is an odd flavor combination: everything is in balance. 

The only thing is that I can't really eat more than one square at a time. After that, the rosemary tastes does start to build up in my mouth enough that I don't want more. But I'd hardly call that a drawback: it just means that one bar lasts longer. 

Given that it's rosemary chocolate, I do wonder how it would be to serve it at Thanksgiving. You could have it as an appetizer with maybe some type of fruit (pears maybe?) or after dinner to transition between turkey and dessert. Yeah, it's all about Thanksgiving to me. 

Thursday, November 12, 2015

More than a Princess, Scoundrel, and Farm Boy

You know what's interesting? Way back in my earliest memories of Star Wars, back when I was in the five to eight years old range, I don't remember thinking of Leia, Han Solo, and Luke as being a princess, a scoundrel, and a farm boy. The identities that they become and that they play for the remainder of the time became so quickly dominant in my head that I think I always saw them as the leader, the captain, and the well, whatever Luke is (he's a lot of different things, that is).

Yet this book is titled A New Hope: The Princess, the Scoundrel, and the Farm Boy expressly so that it can then show why these three characters are more than these simple, initial labels. I'm not sure that that needed to be proven to anybody--after all, other than the fact that people call her princess we never see Leia acting in a particularly royal status (she acts as a leader, yes, but with the destruction of Alderaan, she's not really a princess anymore in anything other than lingering title) and we only see Luke on the farm for a short while (and the most we see him working at the farm is in taking care of the droids, which isn't from our view a particularly farm boyish activity) and we all know that Han is just rough around the edges but does ultimately care.

However. Just because this is something that didn't need to be proven doesn't mean that it wasn't great fun to see it proven.

Back when I read the announcement for this trilogy of books, I thought that they were supposed to be more YA/teen. But it appears that they're designed for a younger audience, I'm guessing around the 10-12 range, though I'm not sure if that was the intended age. At Barnes & Noble, I had to ask for help in finding them because I thought they might be in the teen section, but wasn't expecting them to be in the separate, children's section of the store. I almost felt like maybe I shouldn't be buying them if they really were for that young of an audience, but consoled myself with the fact that at least they were such beautiful covers. All in black with just one color, silhouetted image. A New Hope pictures Leia in profile, with Han and Luke in fighting stance. Under the book jacket, the colors are reversed: the book is blue with the silhouette appearing in black. Just beautiful, really; a great collector's piece. (I just wish it didn't have that soft finish that marks so easily when you touch it.)

The beginning of the book did feel a little dumbed down for age appropriateness. But once it settled in, I almost forgot I was reading a children's book. Yes, it's written in a simpler style, but it's the same content. On the title page, the book is called a retelling of A New Hope. I hadn't exactly been looking forward to reading this trilogy because I thought it would be just another rehashing of the story I've seen dozens of times already. But it's surprisingly fresh and original--especially considering that it's the exact same story. I'm not even entirely sure how Alexandra Bracken managed to do that.

First the book is divided into three sections. Leia tells the first third (in third person), Han tells the middle third, and Luke tells the last third. This means that Han begins his narration at the time when he first appears in the story, while Luke beings speaking after he's already been in on events for a while. So Luke's narration includes some brief explanations of things he's done that the book hasn't shown because it was focused on another character's narration during the time of those events: going after R2, rescuing Leia, etc. Somehow this format works. Leia is able to start in with showing resilience, Han follows up with acceptance of and appreciation of and care for others, and Luke finishes off with understanding his own ability and his capacity to effect positive changes.

There are exact lines of dialogue from the movies, paired up with additional lines and with enough narrator commentary that even lines we're all familiar with had some new context or were at least introduced in a new enough way to keep holding my attention. One or two rough areas are smoothed out, giving some cohesiveness between the stories in the OT and PT.

And it's kind of like having A New Hope retold in a way where you know what is important and why. Back when that movie came out, there was much that the audience didn't know about the characters and the story. And now it's all told with the awareness of certain things--without exactly telling them. If that makes sense. And it's also like having the story retold so that it lingers on what have become our favorite bits, the things we've rallied around. There's more emphasis on what makes Leia's spirit great, on the way the X-wings fly, on the fact that Luke treats R2 more like a person than a droid, that sort of thing.

There is also more of a chance (despite the fairly short length) to linger on things it's easy to forget. In the movie, Luke has that one moment where he looks down in mourning of his aunt and uncle and then he never mentions them again--I don't think the novelizations were any different, either, if I remember right. And Leia looks in shock when Alderaan is destroyed, but she never talks about the fact that her home and family were just destroyed in front of her eyes. So I was glad that they had the chance in here to take their moment of grief and also to look back on it later on and use it to help them remember why they are fighting against the Empire.

The princess who leads a rebellion against oppression, the scoundrel who knows he can't fight just for his own skin, and the farm boy who takes his journey all the way from the desert to becoming a Jedi and right back to reminding his father of something so simple as love for another person.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

What Do You Celebrate? Thanksgiving Edition

I used to think of Thanksgiving as the day that initiates the holiday season, but now I see so much in Thanksgiving itself that I don't think that phrase holds true for me anymore, though it perhaps still does for many people.

Over the years, I've been putting more and more emphasis on Thanksgiving. At first it had a lot to do with the turkeys. I don't know why, but I love turkeys. In third grade, we had a tokens system where we collected "money" from turning in assignments or being good in class, that sort of thing; every so often, our teacher would set out a "store" where we could buy things with our tokens. And one time she set out a turkey made of wood or grasses or something like that; my friend and I were talking about what colors we would paint it if we got it. Then we learned that it was 500 tokens, which was pretty well out of most people's tokens budgets; I, however, had enough. So I very proudly went up to get my turkey and I still set it out every year--sixteen years later. Someone in my family even found a smaller version of it for sale somewhere, so now my turkey has a little brother.

I have also a felt turkey, a wooden twig one, one dressed as a pilgrim, little ceramic ones, vintage toy turkeys, a glass turkey votive holder, and a vintage turkey card in a frame. The turkeys seem to make the place happier as the weather is starting to cool down, when you need something to brighten it up and something to look forward to. Thanksgiving is something to look forward to and something to plan for.

I always want there to be more Thanksgiving things in stores and I get excited whenever there is something just because there is usually very little. I guess what else can they sell besides turkeys, pilgrims, pumpkins, and cornucopias? But still, I want there to be more. Every year, I make molasses crinkles around November; I've started making sugar cookie turkeys to accompany them, which always seems to delight people. Movie-wise, Thanksgiving stories are usually about families complaining while dinner is cooking and then realizing that they like each other despite the arguments by the time the food is ready--so there isn't much to choose from that's any much good. But last year I did find a good one; it's called An Old-Fashioned Thanksgiving. It's a period movie from a few years ago and I thought it was nicely done, so I would recommend you watch it (it's based on a Louisa May Alcott story that I haven't read yet). Snoopy also has some good Thanksgiving cartoons if you catch them when they're on TV.

While I prefer cooking at home versus eating out or buying food to heat, most of us can agree that daily cooking is on a much smaller scale than Thanksgiving cooking--no matter how small a group you're cooking for. But that's exactly what makes Thanksgiving cooking exciting. It's the only time of year that I buy a whole turkey, so it's kind of fun to clean it and season it and babysit it in the oven (I've never done the carving myself). This year actually I think we're going to try and cook it in the barbecue grill, which should be interesting. Then there are all the sides. Pumpkin pie is a big thing in my house: we usually all pitch in the day before to make them and we've finally found a good pie crust recipe (well, years ago we had a good one and then lost it--it took us a while to get another decent one). Last year I made the rolls myself for the first time. Mashed potatoes to boil and prepare. I make the stuffing now, too, so there's toasting the bread and everything now, too. Some sort of vegetable, as well. There are a lot of steps and ingredients, so I start planning well ahead of time and most of the day (and the day before) ends up being devoted to cooking. It's nice to have focus on something simple like the preparation of food.

And now we move on to the Thanksgiving table. In my house, we usually like a semi-formal type of table and usually to get dressed up kind of nice--but to also act very informally. Prettiness and comfort in one, I guess. Sometimes I wear a nice dress with my turkey socks just because I can. Now, most of my extended family doesn't live nearby anymore, so majority of the time Thanksgiving has been a smaller affair, six to eight people tops. These days it's even smaller. Yet while it isn't about seeing relatives you don't usually get to spend much time with (as I know it is for many people), Thanksgiving can still be a day to enjoy and appreciate family. It's the day where you all take a moment to hang around each other, to break bread together and to trade conversation. Even if you only spend Thanksgiving with people you see fairly often, it's still important to appreciate these people--and if Thanksgiving is the day to remind us to appreciate, then that is a good thing.

Wow. Sometimes I'm almost blown away by what Thanksgiving represents. Sometimes I think we are too focused these days on explaining why the Thanksgiving story has nothing to do with actual events and surrounding circumstances--but doing that takes too much emphasis away from Thanksgiving the myth. The myth has a beautiful theme, and it's the theme that's important--and it is lovely that it's a national myth and a national theme. It's the theme of getting along with the people around you (which can apply to family, friends, neighbors, coworkers, etc.), of sharing what you have graciously and receiving gifts gratefully, and of being thankful for life, health, safety, sustenance, and companionship. 

Thanksgiving is like a prayer. Taking in your surroundings, seeing what is good, and asking to be better because you have been given something good.

Friday, November 6, 2015

The Trio's Adventures

You know, it's possible that I might have skipped these three books if I hadn't seen them at Costco and figured that they were worth getting at Costco's prices. I thought they were going to be essentially just lengthy short stories, one for Han Solo (Smuggler's Run), one for Luke (Weapon of a Jedi), and one for Leia (Moving Target)--stories under the "young reader" label once again.

But I learned with Lost Stars that the young reader label doesn't necessarily mean a book doesn't have content. And these three "adventures" were just slightly longer than I was expecting. They're move novellas than lengthy short stories--and Leia's is probably long enough to just call a short book.

For being so short, it's a little odd that they're divided into three parts, plus the Prologue and Epilogue. And for the beginning of each section, there is a two-page illustration--I think the divisions in the book are there simply to give a place for pictures. They are good pictures, after all. They're sort of graphic novel style, in black and white and gray with some spots of red, like the covers. There is so much movement in these illustrations that I had to pause a moment to enjoy each one--I only wish that they didn't show scenes coming up instead of the ones that have just passed. I guess these aren't books where you need to be worried about spoilers, but still I wasn't entirely happy about a picture showing me what was going to happen next before I had a chance to read it.

Content-wise, they are just short adventures told fairly quickly without a lot of fluff. But it's kind of nice not to have a lot of fluff for a change. When I was reading A New Dawn, there were passages that I probably would have liked to have fast forwarded through to get straight to the characters. So with the more concise format of these three little books, I didn't have that problem. Each one has a different point that it sets out to illustrate through retelling (in frame format) a certain story.

It seems also that each book gets better as you go along. Han's is first, then Luke's, and then Leia's.

Han's story fills in the slight gap between Episodes IV and V to explain his growing interest in the Rebellion and its ideals. It also shows off his skills. Pretty straightforward. The "hints" at Episode VII are . . . slight and yet interesting. It feels like things that seem very insignificant now will gain much more meaning after the new movie comes out.

Luke's story is almost a continuation of Heir to the Jedi: Luke is continuing his quest to find out more about the Jedi now that his one living link to them is gone. That's all fun to watch--though I do wish he had done a little more or learned a little more at the temple. But then again, part of the message of this book seemed to be a lesson about patience, so I suppose it's fitting that Luke had to spend a lot of time slowly learning. The frame story in his book is the smallest out of the three--it's also the only one (I think) that takes place within the time frame of the OT and is definitely the only one where the character in question isn't actually present. These details must be significant.

Leia's story is on the grandest scale of the three and also involves the most stages. Being that her team's actions help lead to the final battle in Episode VI, it's a story I already felt invested in, even if it brought me to new worlds and new characters. The theme here was very worth noting. Star Wars is strange because it's in many ways about embracing and promoting peace--and yet it always has war. So this book helped explain that balance and the reasoning behind holding to the one philosophy (peace) while taking part in the cruel and chaotic action of war. The topic is duty--but the lesson is about the importance of the ties that bind different people together. And the hints in this book--well, Leia's acting very Force-sensitive, which of course she does a lot of in Episode VI, too (not quite as much in IV and V). And then there is that mention of names at the end of the book, giving us an idea of timelines (in relation to Episode VII). Once again, it feels like all the information is right there in front of us--just not quite decipherable until we've seen the movie. I feel like I'm missing a very important puzzle piece that will seem obvious once I get it but that I can't grasp on my own.

Just over a month from now.

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Loacker: Tortina Noir

Let's give the chocolate bars a rest and bring out the cookies today, eh? Anyway, we need a little of the simple pleasures around here: first there were the 3.2 and 4.1 earthquakes on Sunday night (Flagstaff and a couple other areas get earthquakes, but not central Arizona) and then lots of wind and rain and some hail today (actually yesterday, when I started this post--it's still raining today, just no hail) (which isn't unusual since it's a wet year, though I haven't seen hail in a while). So, yes, bring out the cookies.

I'm not sure if cookies is the right name. When I saw the package and saw that it had hazelnut cream, I was picturing some type of cookie. But there are in fact only three, individually packaged cookie confections. The box calls them tortina. Each one has two layers of wafer with the hazelnut cream in the middle; the whole thing is covered in dark chocolate. The wafer part is as exciting as the hazelnut: Loacker is the brand that makes those wonderful chocolate wafer squares (there are other flavors, too, but the chocolate ones are the best). So whether you want to call these sweets cookies or wafers or some other name, they do promise to be good.

Each one is around a couple of inches across, perfectly round and good-looking enough to serve to guests with dessert (if there were more than three-just-for-me circles in each box, that is). As with Loacker's other wafer products, the wafer is nice and soft, crunching in just the right way without interfering with the softer cream and chocolate. You can taste the hazelnut and chocolate in pretty balanced proportions to each other. Either or both of them brings in some sweetness, which rounds off the crunch from the wafers. 

One mild complaint for me is the chocolate. It's the sweeter type of dark chocolate, which I generally (or pretty much always) don't care for. But this one isn't so gloppy or unrestrained or tasteless as others, so don't let me scare you away from it. If I'm reading the ingredients list correctly (lists that are made for/by other countries include so many more percentages than lists just for the U.S. do), the chocolate is 60% cocoa. So nothing dark or bitter at all. And as you can see, it's a thin layer (as it should be), so it doesn't have the chance to overwhelm the taste of the hazelnut or the texture of the wafers. 

Balance is the word that comes to mind with something like this. Loacker knows how to balance flavors and textures--which is exactly what makes for addicting eating (think Doritos). I would definitely buy these again, maybe like a once in a while treat (like Arnott's cookies--which I should probably do a review for, as well, since they're one of my favorites). It just depends on whether World Market has them as part of a seasonal display or if they're there to stay. Hopefully to stay, right?